<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="ja">
	<id>http://tpp.wikidb.info/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=IgnacioSedgwick</id>
	<title>TPP問題まとめ - 利用者の投稿記録 [ja]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://tpp.wikidb.info/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=IgnacioSedgwick"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpp.wikidb.info/%E7%89%B9%E5%88%A5:%E6%8A%95%E7%A8%BF%E8%A8%98%E9%8C%B2/IgnacioSedgwick"/>
	<updated>2026-04-04T09:20:09Z</updated>
	<subtitle>利用者の投稿記録</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.36.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://tpp.wikidb.info/index.php?title=Lululemon_Hit_With_Hefty_Fine_After_Spam_Email_Breaches&amp;diff=30745</id>
		<title>Lululemon Hit With Hefty Fine After Spam Email Breaches</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpp.wikidb.info/index.php?title=Lululemon_Hit_With_Hefty_Fine_After_Spam_Email_Breaches&amp;diff=30745"/>
		<updated>2026-04-01T18:28:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;IgnacioSedgwick: ページの作成:「&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Athleisure brand name Lululemon has actually been fined more than $700,000 after [https://staging.wiki.liquidpreview2.net/index.php?title=User:RebekahWorsnop hundreds…」&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Athleisure brand name Lululemon has actually been fined more than $700,000 after [https://staging.wiki.liquidpreview2.net/index.php?title=User:RebekahWorsnop hundreds] of countless emails were sent out without providing the alternative to [http://gdnews.co.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&amp;amp;wr_id=142706 unsubscribe].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The brand name violated spam laws after sending out more than 370,000 e-mails containing commercial content, including shipping updates and promotional material, without an unsubscribe alternative, an Australian Communications and Media [https://truba-rf.ru/user/ColeNutter5093/ Authority investigation] discovered.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The [http://michael-resing.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:TheronEhrlichman watchdog] found Lululemon mischaracterised the service messages, consisting of order verification e-mails, that had a clear marketing purpose in between December 2024 and January 2025.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;In this case Lululemon sent service e-mails such as a shipping updates that also consisted of sales product and direct links to promos,&amp;quot; authority member Samantha Yorke stated.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[https://www.bardjo.ru/top/index.php?a=stats&amp;amp;u=berniegiles0152 Lululemon] has actually paid the $703,000 fine, and says it takes its duties seriously.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The [https://gummipuppen-wiki.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:OliveCloutier99 guard dog] described the breach as quickly preventable.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Businesses require to understand that marketing messages should have an unsubscribe alternative and the simplest method to comply is to keep transactional or service messages different from sales material and links,&amp;quot; Ms [https://gratisafhalen.be/author/freemanroye/ Yorke stated].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;This is the 5th enforcement action the ACMA has undertaken in the last 18 months against companies that have incorrectly treated messages as non-commercial although they included or had links to clearly commercial material.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;In 2024, the [https://gratisafhalen.be/author/daisynunan/ Commonwealth Bank] paid a $7.5 million charge after it sent out more than 170 million [https://nogami-nohken.jp/BTDB/%E5%88%A9%E7%94%A8%E8%80%85:Conrad84Y6 e-mails] that did [https://www.projecthomelab.org/wiki/User:Candida7773 consist] of a way to unsubscribe.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Online betting supplier PointsBet has likewise been struck with a $500,000 penalty after sending 700 [https://bioremediate.net/index.php/User:JannetteSikora0 emails including] a direct link to its betting products without including an unsubscribe function in 2023.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt; paid a $600,000 [https://www.readingcharm.com/index.php?title=User:MargaritaShell6 penalty] after it sent near to 10.5 million [http://www.annunciogratis.net/author/eviehopley5 text messages] that did not comply with [http://www.annunciogratis.net/author/shaystrouse spam laws].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[http://eurekatravel.com.au/best-clean-parallax-theme/ Lululemon] was previously fined more than $32,000 in 2017 for falsely telling [https://azbongda.com/index.php/Th%C3%A0nh_vi%C3%AAn:JudyScarbrough clients] they were not entitled to refunds or replacements.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission alleged the site falsely specified in ads for sale products that [https://cryptoactu.store/index.php?title=User:EliasBoucher1 customers] weren't [http://topsite.otaku-attitude.net/index.php?a=stats&amp;amp;u=martinwoollard entitled] to a return, solution, refund or exchange of a product under any [https://chimali2023.it/the-bet-9ja-promotion-code-this-2026-is-yohaig/ circumstance].&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;The athleisure brand name has entered into a detailed court-enforceable [https://wiki.arbyten.de/index.php?title=Benutzer:AntjeGether878 undertaking] devoting it to an independent evaluation of its [http://www.annunciogratis.net/author/bethanytjan spam guideline] compliance, according to the guard dog.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;[https://maatwerkwiki.nl/index.php?title=User:ChastityEtheridg Business] will need to report to the ACMA on the [http://advantageroots.llc/the-bet-naija-promotional-code-2026-is-yohaig/ application] of advised improvements.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;A [https://wolvesbaneuo.com/wiki/index.php/User:Adela95137 Lululemon spokesperson] informed AAP the company was taking all relevant legal and regulatory requirements really seriously.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;We have worked cooperatively with the Australian Communications and Media Authority to address their findings,&amp;quot; the spokesperson said.&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&amp;quot;We have actually finished a thorough review of our practices for communicating with our visitors and have made updates to our basic guest journey emails, including our order verification and shipment notifications to ensure ongoing compliance.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>IgnacioSedgwick</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>