MPs Argue Over Real Vs Fake Neon

Few times in history have we heard the words neon sign echo inside the oak-panelled Commons. You expect tax codes and foreign policy, not politicians debating signage. But on a spring night after 10pm, Britain’s lawmakers did just that. Labour’s Yasmin Qureshi delivered a passionate case for neon. Her pitch was sharp: authentic neon is heritage, and plastic pretenders are killing the craft. She told MPs straight: only gas-filled glass tubes qualify as neon.

Chris McDonald backed her telling MPs about neon art in Teesside. The mood was electric—pun intended. Facts carried the weight. The pipeline of skills is collapsing. The next generation isn’t coming. Ideas for certification marks were floated. From Strangford, Jim Shannon rose. He quoted growth stats, saying the global neon market could hit $3.3bn by 2031. His message was simple: the glow means commerce as well as culture.

Closing was Chris Bryant, Minister for Creative Industries. He couldn’t resist glowing wordplay, getting teased by Madam Deputy Speaker. But beneath the jokes was recognition. He cited neon’s cultural footprint: Tracey Emin artworks. He said neon’s eco record is unfairly maligned. So why the debate? Because consumers are duped daily. That kills the craft. Think Champagne. If champagne must come from France, why not neon?.

The glow was cultural, not procedural. Do we let a century-old craft vanish? We’re biased but right: gas and glass win every time. So yes, Westminster literally debated neon. It’s still early days, but the glow is alive. If it belongs in the Commons, it belongs in your home. Ditch the pretenders. Choose real neon.


If you beloved this report and you would like to acquire much more details concerning BrightGlow Signs kindly pay a visit to the webpage.