The Cultural Case For Neon

British MPs seldom discuss aesthetics. Policy, economics, foreign affairs. One late night in Westminster, the subject was neon. Labour’s Yasmin Qureshi, brought heritage into the chamber. Her message was uncompromising: authentic neon is cultural heritage. She contrasted it with cheap LED substitutes, arguing they dilute the name neon. Only gas-filled tubes deserve the title. Chris McDonald, MP for Stockton North, speaking of local artists.

There was broad recognition. Statistics gave weight to the passion. Only 27 full-time neon benders remain in Britain. No apprentices follow. Without action, a century-old craft may die. Ideas were floated for a protection act, like Cornish pasties. Defend the craft. From Strangford, Jim Shannon rose, pointing to industry growth. Reports show 7.5% annual growth. His point: this is not nostalgia but business. Chris Bryant concluded the session. He allowed himself puns, drawing laughter.

Yet after the laughter, he acknowledged the case. He recalled iconic glows: Piccadilly Circus billboards. He emphasised longevity. What is at stake? The answer is authenticity. Craft is undermined. That erodes trust. It is no different to whisky or Champagne. If Champagne must be French, then signage should tell the truth. This was about culture. Do we accept homogenised plastic across every street? At Smithers, the stance is firm: neon lights store glass and gas still matter.

Westminster glowed for a night. The protection remains a proposal. But the case is stronger than ever. If MPs can recognise craft, buy neon lights so can homeowners. Skip LED pretenders. Choose neon.


In case you adored this article and you wish to acquire details with regards to LIT Labs generously pay a visit to the website.